Services / DPO Services — EU & UK GDPR
Outsourced DPO services — independent, and practical
An outsourced DPO is a data protection officer appointed from outside your organisation — the role the GDPR requires, held by a specialist rather than a member of your staff.
No automated signup — short discovery, clear scope, and a proposal aligned to your markets.
Acting for a client? We are appointed behind professional advisers and report to you. Your relationship with your client stays yours.
You need one if you are a public authority, if your core activities require large-scale regular monitoring of people, or if you process criminal or special-category data at scale. Many organisations appoint one voluntarily because a regulator, a customer or an investor asked. Run the two-minute check.
Privacy Core Services holds the role for you: named contact for your supervisory authority, board-ready reporting, and the written evidence that shows the role is genuinely independent.
Why your DPO cannot report to the person they audit
Article 38(6) of the GDPR permits a DPO to hold other duties — but only where those duties create no conflict of interest. In practice that rules out most of the people organisations first think of. A head of IT, a head of HR, a general counsel or a managing director all determine the purposes and means of processing. They cannot credibly audit decisions they made themselves, and regulators have said so.
That is the structural reason to appoint from outside. An outsourced DPO has no reporting line into your operations, no budget to defend and no internal decision to protect — which is exactly what Article 38 asks for and what a supervisory authority looks for when it examines the appointment.
Article 37(6) permits the role to be filled under a service contract. Appointing externally is not a workaround; it is the route the regulation names.
Outsourced DPO, or DPO as a service, vs internal vs ‘privacy lead’
| Outsourced DPO | Internal hire | 'Privacy lead' (no DPO) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independence | Structurally independent — no other role in the organisation to conflict with | Achievable, but hard in small teams where the DPO also owns processing decisions | Not a DPO: no statutory role, no protected independence |
| Expertise & cover | Senior practitioner plus team; holiday and absence covered | One person's bandwidth and specialism; cover is your problem | Varies; usually privacy is a fraction of their job |
| Cost shape | Predictable retainer, scales with need | Full salary + training + tooling for a role many SMEs cannot fill full-time | Hidden: unmanaged risk and rework |
| When it fits | Art. 37 trigger applies, or you want the discipline without the headcount | Large-scale, complex processing that needs a daily on-site presence | Only where no trigger applies and risk is genuinely low — check first |
What drives the cost of each model: DPO pricing, explained honestly.
Outcomes
Governance outcomes you can show
Independent oversight with evidence, cadence, and reporting that stands up to scrutiny.
Clear mandate and reporting line, separated from day-to-day operations and conflicts.
RoPA, DPIAs/TIAs, DSAR and incident logs, vendor records, and training evidence.
KPIs, risk register, and structured reporting directors can act on.
Scope
What’s included as standard
Core governance deliverables that stay maintainable — not shelfware.
Document independence, responsibilities, escalation path and comms routes.
Support for RoPA, DPIAs/TIAs, DSAR & incident workflows with DPO opinions when needed.
Input on DPAs, DDQs, security reviews and customer / regulator queries.
Playbooks, sign-off patterns, regulator thresholds and evidence for decisions.
Email support with agreed turnaround; optional office hours and enablement.
Quarterly/semi-annual reporting on KPIs, risks, actions and remediation progress.
Clarity
How DPO support works in practice
Clear delivery expectations — and what typically goes wrong elsewhere.
| Capability | Our approach | Typical alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Independence | Formal mandate, conflict management, direct reporting line. | Unclear role; DPO wearing multiple conflicting hats. |
| Registers & evidence | Structured RoPA, DPIAs, DSAR & incident logs with audit trail. | Scattered docs in shared drives/spreadsheets. |
| Board engagement | Regular reporting with KPIs, risks and actions. | Ad-hoc updates after issues arise. |
| Support model | Pragmatic advisory aligned to delivery cycles. | Purely legal memos disconnected from reality. |
| Regulator & buyer posture | Evidence pack ready for regulators and procurement. | Last-minute scramble to answer questionnaires. |
FAQ
Questions, answered
Clear answers to the objections we hear most.
Do we actually need to appoint a DPO?
Can you be both DPO and consultant?
Can you cover both EU and UK GDPR?
Will this slow product or sales down?
Is an outsourced DPO actually allowed?
How is independence protected?
What if we already have someone doing privacy internally?
Which regulators can you deal with?
How quickly can a DPO be in place?
Next step
Request DPO support
Share your markets, resourcing, and risk profile. We’ll reply with a scoped plan and clear proposal.
Ask for outsourced/virtual DPO, support for an internal DPO, or a one-off assessment.
